RSM logo
Clinical Ethics

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Clin Ethics 2006;1:146-151
doi:10.1258/147775006778246450
© 2006 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, C.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Public Policy & Law

The legal and ethical implications of therapeutic privilege - is it ever justified to withhold treatment information from a competent patient?

Carolyn Johnston and Genevieve Holt

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, King's College London, 5 Lambeth Walk, London SE11 6SP, UK 1 Department of General Practice and Primary Care, King's College London, 5 Lambeth Walk, London SE11 6SP, UK carolyn.johnston{at}kcl.ac.uk 2 St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK thamitheen{at}gmail.com

This article examines the standard of disclosure, set by law, of risks of treatment and alternative procedures that should normally be disclosed to patients. Therapeutic privilege has been recognized by the courts as an exception to this standard of disclosure. It provides a justification for withholding such information from competent patients in the interests of patient welfare. The article explores whether this justification is either legally or ethically defensible. In assessing patient welfare, the health care professional is required to consider the patient's overall best interests - but this is not limited to an assessment of medical best interests. It is contended that the health care professional is neither qualified nor justified in making such a judgement, as the law recognizes that a competent adult patient determines her own best interests. This is not possible without sufficient information of risks to inform the decision.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Med PhilosHome page
C. Brown
Kant and Therapeutic Privilege
J Med Philos, August 1, 2008; 33(4): 321 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]