RSM logo
Clinical Ethics

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Clin Ethics 2007;2:36-41
doi:10.1258/147775007780267219
© 2007 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wirtz, V
Right arrow Articles by Barber, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Empirical Ethics

The use of informed consent for medication treatment in hospital: a qualitative study of the views of doctors and nurses

V Wirtz*, A Cribb{dagger} and N Barber{ddagger}

* Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Mexico; Department of Practice and Policy, The School of Pharmacy, University of London, UK; {dagger} Centre for Public Policy Research, King's College London, UK; 3 Department of Practice and Policy, The School of Pharmacy, University of London, UK
vwirtz{at}correo.insp.mx; veronikawirtz{at}hotmail.com

The use of informed consent for surgery or research has been widely studied; however, its use in other areas of clinical practice has received less attention. This study investigates how doctors and nurses understand informed consent in relation to the prescription and administration of medicines in secondary care. It uses a qualitative analysis of semi-structured in-depth interviews with 19 doctors and 6 nurses recruited from various specialties in a teaching hospital. The results indicate a striking gap between official and actual standards of practice. Providing information, assuring adherence and communication about potential treatment harms were raised as key issues instead of the principal goals of informed consent. Rather than simply treating these findings as support for a 'deficit' account of professionalism, the paper concludes that we need a richer and more grounded account of exactly when hospital medication decisions need to be subjected to the highest standards of informed consent.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?