RSM logo
Clinical Ethics

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Clin Ethics 2008;3:75-84
doi:10.1258/ce.2008.008008
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ives, J.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Empirical Ethics

Becoming a father/refusing fatherhood: an empirical bioethics approach to paternal responsibilities and rights

Jonathan Ives * {dagger}  , Heather Draper * , Helen Pattison {ddagger}  and Clare Williams § 

* Centre for the Study of Global Ethics, Department of Philosophy, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham {dagger} Centre for Human Reproductive Science (ChRS), Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK {ddagger} School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham § School of Social Science & Public Policy, King's College, London, UK

E-mail: j.c.ives{at}bham.ac.uk

In this paper, we present the first stage of an empirical bioethics project exploring the moral sources of paternal responsibilities and rights. In doing so, we present both (1) data on men's normative constructions of fatherhood and (2) the first of a two-stage methodological approach to empirical bioethics. Using data gathered from 12 focus groups run with UK men who have had a variety of different fathering experiences (n = 50), we examine men's perspectives on how paternal responsibilities and rights are generated and the significance of the genetic connection within the father–child relationship.

We do not attempt to explore men's experiences of fatherhood or their fathering practices; and neither is the analysis driven from a particular sociological perspective. Rather, we explore men's normative constructions of fatherhood in order to present accessible data that might be of significance to the philosophical/moral debate on the sources of paternal rights and responsibilities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




History of the London Clinic