Clinical Ethics > Volume 4, Number 2 > Pp. 85-90

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by McDougall, R J Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Empirical Ethics

Being ‘one cog in a bigger machine’: a qualitative study investigating ethical challenges perceived by junior doctors

R J McDougall  

Centre for Health and Society, Level 4, 207 Bouverie Street, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia

E-mail: rmcdo{at}unimelb.edu.au

There is increasing recognition among bioethicists that health-care practitioners' everyday ethical challenges ought to be the focus of ethical analysis. Interviews were conducted with Australian junior doctors to identify some of the kinds of situations that they found ethically challenging, as a basis for this type of grounded philosophical analysis and for further empirical research into junior doctors' ethical issues. Fourteen doctors in their first to fourth year of work from six hospitals in Melbourne participated. Issues discussed included involvement in treatment perceived as inappropriate, seniors discouraging disclosure of errors, coping when requested help was not forthcoming, observing behaviour perceived as unethical, truth-telling and informed consent. The difficulties described often focused on interactions with colleagues and position in the health-care team. Although the results cannot be generalized to junior doctors as a population, these junior doctors' stories point to various issues warranting further investigation, both philosophical and empirical.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?