Clinical Ethics > Volume 4, Number 3 > Pp. 125-130

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Førde, R. Articles by Hansen, T. W. R. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Empirical Ethics

Involving patients and relatives in a Norwegian clinical ethics committee: what have we learned?

Reidun Førde ^*   and Thor Willy Ruud Hansen   

^* Section for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway Division of Paediatrics, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet Oslo, Oslo, Norway Faculty Division Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

E-mail: reidun.forde{at}medisin.uio.no

To date, few Norwegian clinical ethics committees (CECs) have included patients or next of kin in case discussions. In 2008, Rikshospitalet's (The National Hospital's) CEC began to routinely invite patients and relatives into case discussions. In this paper, we describe seven cases discussed by this committee in 2008. Six involved life and death decision-making in collaboration with the next of kin, while one related case did not include relatives. In our opinion, representing the patient's perspective was advantageous to the discussion itself, to the conclusion made and to the next of kin's acceptance of the resolution. We believe that if the patient had been represented in the last case, the outcome might have been different. We conclude that successful patient involvement will rely on well-structured case discussions, an open atmosphere and good preparation and follow-up.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. J Newson, G. Neitzke, and S. Reiter-Theil The role of patients in European clinical ethics consultation Clin Ethics, September 1, 2009; 4(3): 109 - 110. [Full Text] [PDF]