RSM logo
Clinical Ethics

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Clin Ethics 2009;4:131-138
doi:10.1258/ce.2009.009020
© 2009 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fournier, V.
Right arrow Articles by Newson, A. J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Empirical Ethics

Clinical ethics consultation in Europe: a comparative and ethical review of the role of patients

Véronique Fournier * , Eirini Rari *, Reidun Førde {dagger}, Gerald Neitzke {ddagger}, Renzo Pegoraro § and Ainsley J Newson **

* Centre d'éthique clinique, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 27 rue du faubourg Saint Jacques 75014 Paris, France {dagger} Section for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Olso, Norway {ddagger} Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical University, Hannover, Germany § Fondatione Lanza, Padova, Italy ** Centre for Ethics in Medicine, Department of Community Based Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

E-mail: veronique.fournier{at}cch.aphp.fr

Clinical ethics has developed significantly in Europe over the past 15 years and remains an evolving process. While sharing our experiences in different European settings, we were surprised to discover marked differences in our practice, especially regarding the position and role of patients. In this paper, we describe these differences, such as patient access to and participation or representation in ethics consults. We propose reasons to explain these differences, hypothesizing that they relate to the historic and sociocultural context of implementation of clinical ethics consultation services (Cecs), as well as the initial aims for which each structure was established. Then, we analyse those differences with common ethical arguments arising in patient involvement. We conclude that there is no unique model of best practice for patient involvement in clinical ethics, as far as Cecs reflect on how to deal with the challenging ethical issues raised by patient role and position.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin EthicsHome page
A. Slowther
Focusing clinicians on ethics
Clin Ethics, December 1, 2009; 4(4): 163 - 164.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin EthicsHome page
A. J Newson, G. Neitzke, and S. Reiter-Theil
The role of patients in European clinical ethics consultation
Clin Ethics, September 1, 2009; 4(3): 109 - 110.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Acute CT - A Primer of Emergency Imaging